Extras Are Not Principles

Most of you know I am sure of www.imdb.com aka internet movie database. which is the end all be all of movie information of movies past , current and future. Well what has been happening as of late is that under movies that have filmed in Boston actors that were extras have listed their names and photos under the principles list. This one action that has been going on the past 24 months has led a division line right down the middle of the new england actor community. The debate is extras should not list their names under the principles list. My opinion is I agree with them. If you were working as a background performer in a film you really have no business listing your name under the credits. As a recent 2nd assistant director from a major feature film that was just here stated and I quote " if your name is not going to be on the end credits, your name should not be on the imdb under the cast of that film" If you said "boo" in the movie and were paid for it, sure your name should appear or if you were a "stand in" of course! But as an extra is just doesn't go.

Comments

Anonymous said…
According to Webster:

principle:

1 a: a comprehensive and fundamental law, doctrine, or assumption

principal:

1 f: a leading performer
February 12, 2008 at 3:34 PM
Anonymous said…
LOL!
February 14, 2008 at 6:42 PM
Anonymous said…
On imdb.com Extras are usually credited as

Name - role -(uncredited)

Then again you have to have done a principal role in order to have your uncredited's listed.
February 14, 2008 at 6:45 PM
Anonymous said…
I worked as an extra! Now if I see myself in the final cut, why can't I get listed as say 'quiet bar man' (uncredited)?
February 15, 2008 at 7:41 AM
Anonymous said…
Please answer. If you were an extra is it okay to be listed as -Uuncredited?
February 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM
Anonymous said…
No, extras shouldn't be credited. Maybe a mass accreditation. The credits would be longer than the feature.

I have been an extra.
February 22, 2008 at 5:23 PM
Anonymous said…
The IMDB instructions say nothing about extras not being allowed to enter their data. So no one has a legitimate reason to be upset with them for doing something they have every reason to think is legitimate.
February 27, 2008 at 12:27 PM
Anonymous said…
Imdb allows extras to be credited as (Uncredited). So what's the big deal if the extra wants to be credited? They did their job right? Oh how some people want to hog the limelight!
March 6, 2008 at 12:33 PM
Anonymous said…
I agree. That would be a problem listing them on the film's credits. I think maybe someone is misunderstanding, and thinking that same logic must be applied to IMDB? Another case of treating extras like dirt.
May 15, 2008 at 1:04 PM
Anonymous said…
There is a major fault in logic that must be pointed out here. Producer's contracts with SAG do not stipulate that EVERY speaking actor has a credit title. Rather, it allows UP to a certain number - something like 50, I think. This will come as quite a shock to some people, but it is true. That means if a movie has 100 speaking parts, the filmmakers are in their right to not include half of them. So going by the logic of the original post here, those speaking actors have no business listing their roles on IMDB, either.
One is an orange, the other is an apple. What is the big deal, anyway? Sheesh!
August 8, 2008 at 9:01 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

People agreeing to work and not showing up.

I was on a project yesterday (Mall Cop) which was a nice experience and worked with nice people. What amazed some people is that there were a few no-shows, what I had said to them is don't be too surprised because this happens more than you think. When that happens that screws a lot of people up first the production because they are expecting their numbers for that day, and people that actually wanted to work that day. So if you can't make it on that project for any reason please call the casting director the day prior so they can fill in your spot. It's the best thing you can do in that situation to still be good with the casting directors and the production.
Read more

Are future films in jeporady because of looming strike?

That is a question really no one knows and is asked quite often. If there is a strike and it does last as long as the writers strike does, that will be a problem. But let's hope everything gets resolved by next month so the ongoing traffic of movies continues here in our very cool state. strike,
Read more

Portions of the SAG strike my be resolved sooner than later.

What I have heard as of late is that the upcoming strike might not be as long as some people are projecting. Certain aspects have already been cleared. So, with that being said it might no be as long as a process as the previuos writers strike. I think that strike did so much damage that SAG probably does not want to go down that road but we will see.
Read more